Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc. v. The Vessel Olympic Javelin

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided January 13, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-01018·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

DOLPHIN COVE INN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:19-cv-1018-J-34JRK

THE VESSEL OLYMPIC JAVELIN, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture and furnishings, equipment, and appurtenances, in rem, et al.,

Defendants. /

O R D E R

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60; Report) entered by the Honorable James R. Klindt, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 22, 2020. In the Report, Judge Klindt recommends that Plaintiff Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants the Vessel Olympic Javelin, Southern Marine Services, Inc. and Frederick Gatchell (Doc. 28; First Motion) be granted in part and denied in part and that Plaintiff Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Mark Tarlowski (Doc. 58; Second Motion) be granted. See Report at 31. To date, no objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the

district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8- FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in Judge

Klindt’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60) is ADOPTED as the

opinion of the Court. 2. Plaintiff Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants the Vessel Olympic Javelin, Southern Marine Services, Inc. and Frederick Gatchell (Doc. 28; First Motion) is GRANTED in

part and DENIED in part. 3. Plaintiff Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Mark Tarlowski (Doc. 58; Second Motion) is GRANTED.

2 4. The First Motion and the Second Motion are GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a joint and several judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Southern Marine Services, Inc.; Frederick Gatchell; and Mark Tarlowski for damages in the amount of $42,826.00 plus pre-judgment interest at a rate of 4.51%, attorney’s fees in the amount of $16,290.50; and costs in the amount of $1,505.00. 5. The First Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks the entry of default judgment against Defendant the Vessel Olympic Javelin and to the extent it seeks a maritime lien. 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. 7. Plaintiff directed to file a notice on April 12, 2021, and every ninety (90) days thereafter, advising the Court of the status of its efforts to locate the Vessel. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 13th day of January, 2021.

United States District Judge

ja Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Southern Marine Services, Inc. & Frederick Gatchell 604 Shorewood Drive, Unit 204 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

Mark Tarlowski ccaptainmark@gmail.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc. v. The Vessel Olympic Javelin, (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc. v. The Vessel Olympic Javelin (Dolphin Cove Inn, Inc. v. The Vessel Olympic Javelin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company
37 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Garvey v. Vaughn
993 F.2d 776 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)