Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers

New York Court of Appeals

Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers

229 N.E.2d 702, 20 N.Y.2d 743, 283 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1327

DecidedJuly 7, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 229 N.E.2d 702 (Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers, 229 N.E.2d 702, 20 N.Y.2d 743, 283 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1327 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions involving the [744]*744construction of the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Petitioner contended that the police power of the municipality (Town of Gates) had been unconstitutionally exercised against it and that' its property had been unconstitutionally taken, without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as applied to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that there was no constitutional impairment of any property right of petitioner. [See 19 N Y 2d 739.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions involving the [744]*744construction of the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Petitioner contended that the police power of the municipality (Town of Gates) had been unconstitutionally exercised against it and that' its property had been unconstitutionally taken, without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as applied to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that there was no constitutional impairment of any property right of petitioner. [See 19 N Y 2d 739.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 N.E.2d 702, 20 N.Y.2d 743, 283 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolomite-products-co-v-kipers-ny-1967.