Dolliff v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 239, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3995
United States Customs Court·Decided March 14, 1963·No. No. 67510; protests 309088-K, etc. (Boston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mi,niature railroad equipment, which includes locomotives and other railroad cars, tracks, and accessories, similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk's Model Graft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” or “B” at 22% percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs a,nd Trade (T.D. 51802), for manufactures of metal; the items marked “O” at 13% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; the items marked “D” at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for transformers; and the items marked “E” at 17% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for electrical wiring apparatus, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolliff v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 239, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3995 (cusc 1963).

50 Cust. Ct. 239 (Dolliff v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.