Dolliff v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 370
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1956
DocketNo. 59758; petition 7171-R. (Boston)
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 370 (Dolliff v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolliff v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

The record disclosed that the member of the petitioning firm who made entry of the merchandise had recently passed away and, further, that the examiner with whom he had consulted with regard to value had since been transferred to Government service in France. However, the appraiser testified that he recalled consultations with the examiner pertaining to the transac[371]*371tion involved; that he had known the entrant for approximately 30 years; and that he was satisfied that the entrant had cooperated fully in presenting all information desired. Counsel for the Government stated that a special agent’s report had been received by his office, two paragraphs of which were read into evidence. Said report states that the failure of the importer to amend the entry was the result of a misunderstanding occasioned by his illness and subsequent absence from his office. Accordingly, it was recommended that the petition receive favorable consideration. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolliff-v-united-states-cusc-1956.