Dollen v. Dyer
This text of Dollen v. Dyer (Dollen v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEVERLY DOLLEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-2552 (UNA) ) LORA DYER, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in
forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and pro se Complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court GRANTS the
application and, for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the Complaint and this civil action
without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Beverly Dolen’s three minor children have been removed from her custody, and it
appears that Defendants, among whom are agents of Child Protective Services of West Virginia,
the children’s guardian ad litem, the children’s biological father, and a judge, played some role in
the children’s removal. Plaintiffs demand the children’s return. But the Court lacks jurisdiction.
See Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 703 (1992) (concluding “that the domestic relations
exception . . . divests the federal courts of power to issue divorce, alimony, and child custody
decrees”); Bennett v. Bennett, 682 F.2d 1039, 1042 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (explaining that domestic
relationship exception divests federal court of jurisdiction over “grant[ing] a divorce,
determin[ing] alimony or support obligations, or resolv[ing] parental conflicts over the custody
of their children”). Nor does this Court have jurisdiction to review, revise, or overturn any ruling
of a West Virginia court. See, e.g., United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79, 85 (D.D.C. 2011)
(district courts “generally lack[] appellate jurisdiction over other judicial bodies, and cannot
1 exercise appellate mandamus over other courts”) (citing Lewis v. Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553
(D.D.C. 1986)). Accordingly, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and dismisses the
Complaint.
An Order is issued separately.
DATE: November 21, 2024 ANA C. REYES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dollen v. Dyer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dollen-v-dyer-dcd-2024.