Dollard v. Dollard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dollard v. Dollard

257 A.D. 836, 12 N.Y.S.2d 897, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

■ Order granting defendant’s motion to take the testimony of plaintiff’s physician before a referee, to use in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for increased alimony and counsel fee and for other relief, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiff by the allegations in her reply and moving affidavit waived the protection of the statute for herself and for the infant for whose benefit the increased alimony was sought. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11; Hethier v. Johns, 233 id. 370; Steinberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., 263 id. 45.) Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ Order granting defendant’s motion to take the testimony of plaintiff’s physician before a referee, to use in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for increased alimony and counsel fee and for other relief, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiff by the allegations in her reply and moving affidavit waived the protection of the statute for herself and for the infant for whose benefit the increased alimony was sought. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11; Hethier v. Johns, 233 id. 370; Steinberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., 263 id. 45.) Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Dollard v. Dollard, 257 A.D. 836, 12 N.Y.S.2d 897, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 836 (Dollard v. Dollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related