Dollard v. Dollard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dollard v. Dollard

257 A.D. 836, 12 N.Y.S.2d 897, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 836 (Dollard v. Dollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dollard v. Dollard, 257 A.D. 836, 12 N.Y.S.2d 897, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

■ Order granting defendant’s motion to take the testimony of plaintiff’s physician before a referee, to use in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for increased alimony and counsel fee and for other relief, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiff by the allegations in her reply and moving affidavit waived the protection of the statute for herself and for the infant for whose benefit the increased alimony was sought. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11; Hethier v. Johns, 233 id. 370; Steinberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., 263 id. 45.) Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ Order granting defendant’s motion to take the testimony of plaintiff’s physician before a referee, to use in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for increased alimony and counsel fee and for other relief, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiff by the allegations in her reply and moving affidavit waived the protection of the statute for herself and for the infant for whose benefit the increased alimony was sought. (Capron v. Douglass, 193 N. Y. 11; Hethier v. Johns, 233 id. 370; Steinberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., 263 id. 45.) Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 836, 12 N.Y.S.2d 897, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dollard-v-dollard-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack