Dollar v. Allen-West Commission Co.

78 Miss. 274
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 78 Miss. 274 (Dollar v. Allen-West Commission Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dollar v. Allen-West Commission Co., 78 Miss. 274 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A county, if its board of supervisors object, cannot be garnisheed, either at law or in equity. If it does not object, the debtor cannot object. But in the case before us it did object,, [278]*278and so Dollman v. Moore, 70 Miss., 267, s.c. 12 So., 23, 19 L. R. A., 222, has no application. The two cases are entirely disparata. While the matter is not jurisdictional, in the discretion of the court, so as to prevent decree where the board submits itself to the jurisdiction, the courts must always, in the nature of things, entertain and sustain its objection. The board, and not the court, is the judge of whether the proceedings will ‘ hamper or restrict it in the performance of public functions,” in the language of Justice Cooper.

Reversed, and bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-South Paving Co. v. State Highway Commission
20 So. 2d 834 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1945)
City of Natchez v. Craig
3 So. 2d 837 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)
Duval County v. Charleston Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
45 Fla. 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Clarksdale Compress Co. v. Caldwell Co.
80 Miss. 343 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Miss. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dollar-v-allen-west-commission-co-miss-1900.