Dollar Dry Dock Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dollar Dry Dock Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau

166 A.D.2d 648, 560 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 166 A.D.2d 648 (Dollar Dry Dock Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dollar Dry Dock Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau, 166 A.D.2d 648, 560 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In a tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review real property assessments made for the tax years 1984, 1985 and 1986, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), entered July 20, 1988, which, inter alia, did not reduce the assessments to the value found by the petitioner’s real estate appraiser.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly evaluated the conflicting expert testimony in this case (see, People ex rel. MacCracken v Miller, 291 NY 55; Matter of City of New York [Newtown Cr.], 284 NY 493; Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus, v Kondzielaski, 131 AD2d 675). The court’s conclusion as to the appropriate assessments for the tax years in question was within the range of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Garsky v Kondzielaski, 113 AD2d 834). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a tax certiorari proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review real property assessments made for the tax years 1984, 1985 and 1986, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), entered July 20, 1988, which, inter alia, did not reduce the assessments to the value found by the petitioner’s real estate appraiser.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly evaluated the conflicting expert testimony in this case (see, People ex rel. MacCracken v Miller, 291 NY 55; Matter of City of New York [Newtown Cr.], 284 NY 493; Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus, v Kondzielaski, 131 AD2d 675). The court’s conclusion as to the appropriate assessments for the tax years in question was within the range of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Garsky v Kondzielaski, 113 AD2d 834). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 648, 560 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dollar-dry-dock-savings-bank-v-board-of-assessors-of-the-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack