Doll v. Jorgenson

New York City Court

Doll v. Jorgenson

19 N.Y.S. 1024, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 968

DecidedJune 27, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.Y.S. 1024 (Doll v. Jorgenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doll v. Jorgenson, 19 N.Y.S. 1024, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 968 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case shows that only a single question of fact was litigated at the trial,—whether or not the defendant acted as the agent of the plaintiff in the sale of certain real estate in this city. The testimony was conflicting, and the jury found that the defendant was not such agent. No exception was taken to the charge, and there is no certificate that the case contains all the testimony. We have examined the record, and find no error.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The case shows that only a single question of fact was litigated at the trial,—whether or not the defendant acted as the agent of the plaintiff in the sale of certain real estate in this city. The testimony was conflicting, and the jury found that the defendant was not such agent. No exception was taken to the charge, and there is no certificate that the case contains all the testimony. We have examined the record, and find no error.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.Y.S. 1024, 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doll-v-jorgenson-nycityct-1892.