Dolinger v. State

786 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2001 WL 669946
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 2001
DocketNo. 2D01-74
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 786 So. 2d 1267 (Dolinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolinger v. State, 786 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2001 WL 669946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order determining that Peter B. Dolinger was not entitled to resentencing under the 1994 sentencing guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Dolinger might have to pursue the issue of jail credit by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Dolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merson v. State
786 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2001 WL 669946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolinger-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.