Dolinger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dolinger v. State

786 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2001 WL 669946

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 2001·No. No. 2D01-74·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order determining that Peter B. Dolinger was not entitled to resentencing under the 1994 sentencing guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Dolinger might have to pursue the issue of jail credit by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Dolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order determining that Peter B. Dolinger was not entitled to resentencing under the 1994 sentencing guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Dolinger might have to pursue the issue of jail credit by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Dolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Dolinger v. State, 786 So. 2d 1267, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103, 2001 WL 669946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

786 So. 2d 1267 (Dolinger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related