Dolinger v. Rasmussen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dolinger v. Rasmussen

609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1992 WL 362189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 9, 1992

DocketNo. 92-04125

StatusPublished

This text of 609 So. 2d 166 (Dolinger v. Rasmussen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dolinger v. Rasmussen, 609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1992 WL 362189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peter Dolinger seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order which denied his petition for writ of prohibition.

Since Dolinger’s petition was an original civil proceeding governed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630, the proper method for review by this court is appeal rather than certiorari. Holmes v. Bonanno, 484 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, in any event we agree with the circuit court that Dolinger’s petition “does not show a prima facie case for relief.” No responsive brief is necessary. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a).

Affirmed.

HALL, A.C.J:, and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI