Dolinger v. Rasmussen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dolinger v. Rasmussen

609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1992 WL 362189

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1992·No. No. 92-04125·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peter Dolinger seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order which denied his petition for writ of prohibition.

Since Dolinger’s petition was an original civil proceeding governed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630, the proper method for review by this court is appeal rather than certiorari. Holmes v. Bonanno, 484 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, in any event we agree with the circuit court that Dolinger’s petition “does not show a prima facie case for relief.” No responsive brief is necessary. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a).

Affirmed.

HALL, A.C.J:, and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Peter Dolinger seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order which denied his petition for writ of prohibition.

Since Dolinger’s petition was an original civil proceeding governed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630, the proper method for review by this court is appeal rather than certiorari. Holmes v. Bonanno, 484 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, in any event we agree with the circuit court that Dolinger’s petition “does not show a prima facie case for relief.” No responsive brief is necessary. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a).

Affirmed.

HALL, A.C.J:, and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Dolinger v. Rasmussen, 609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12445, 1992 WL 362189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

609 So. 2d 166 (Dolinger v. Rasmussen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related