Dolgon v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.

251 A.D.2d 281, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296, inter alia, to recover damages for age discrimination, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated July 3, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

[282] There are triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff was replaced by a younger person and whether the reason advanced by the defendants for his discharge was, in fact, a pretext (see, Mayer v Manton Cork Corp., 126 AD2d 526). Thus, the defendants did not establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolgon v. Standard Motor Products, Inc., 251 A.D.2d 281, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 281 (Dolgon v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grella v. St. Francis Hospital
2017 NY Slip Op 3157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Listemann v. Philips Components
13 A.D.3d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)