Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. Esiquio & Ida Espinoza Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2011·No. 04-10-00765-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00765-CV

DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. d/b/a Dollar General, Appellant

v.

Esiquio ESPINOZA and Ida V. Espinoza Jr., Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Misty Dawn Espinoza, Deceased; Liliana Valdez, as Next of Friend for D’Anthony Michael Blades; Victor Blades, as Administrator of the Estate of Clarence A. Blades, Jr. and on Behalf of Clarence A Blades Sr.; and Choroland I. McQueen, Individually, Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CI-16363 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 2, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

By order of this court, oral argument in this case was set for January 26, 2011. However,

on January 21, 2011, appellees filed a notice of nonsuit of all their claims in the trial court, with a

courtesy copy filed in this court. In response, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, and

requested that we assess costs against appellees. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4 (stating that 04-10-00765-CV

in civil cases, court of appeals may, for good cause, tax costs in contravention of general rules

governing costs).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. Esiquio & Ida Espinoza Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. Esiquio & Ida Espinoza Jr. (Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. Esiquio & Ida Espinoza Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.