Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJanuary 2, 2020
Docket4:18-cv-01553
StatusUnknown

This text of Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc. (Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING 7 CORPORATION, Case No. 18-cv-1553 YGR

8 PLAINTIFF, PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 3 RE: TRIAL 9 V. CONFERENCE

10 ADOBE INC. F/K/A, ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED 11 DEFENDANT. 12 ____________________________________ 13 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 14 Having considered the filings to date and the arguments and other submissions at the 15 Pretrial Conference, held on December 20, 2019, for good cause shown the Court enters the 16 following orders: 17 1. Trial Date and Schedule: The trial of this matter is confirmed to proceed in Courtroom 1. 18 Jury Selection shall begin at beginning at 9:00 a.m. on January 31, 2020. All remaining trial 19 days shall begin at 8:30 a.m. Counsel shall arrive in court early enough to proceed each day 20 promptly at 8:00 a.m. Trial schedule will be Monday through Thursday, from 8:30 a.m. to 21 1:30 p.m. with two fifteen-minute breaks. Additional time may be scheduled for matters 22 outside the presence of the jury as necessary and determined by the Court. Sidebars are not 23 permitted. Counsel should be prepared to anticipate issues so that they may be addressed 24 outside of normal trial hours. In this regard, Counsel should also be prepared to reconvene 25 with the Court after the Court’s standing calendars which normally begin at 2:00 p.m. 26 2. The parties shall each be afforded (6 days) twenty-seven (27) hours to present their case, 27 including opening statements and closing arguments. The Court shall reserve one hour for 1 plaintiff and one hour for defendant for closing arguments. The parties shall receive daily 2 timesheets advising of the time remaining. Any concerns must be raised immediately or will 3 be waived. 4 3. The Court sets the next pre-trial conference for January 24, 2020 at 8:00 a.m. By January 5 15, 2020, the parties shall submit a joint list of issues to be addressed at the conference. If no 6 such issues arise, the Court may take the conference off calendar. 7 4. Standard Motions in Limine: The Court hereby orders that: (a) witnesses shall be excluded 8 until testimony is completed; (b) there shall be no reference to or evidence presented of 9 settlement discussions, mediation, or insurance; and (c) there shall be no reference to or 10 evidence presented of wealth or lack thereof of any party except in the punitive damage phase 11 of a case, to the extent it exists. 12 A motion in limine refers “to any motion, whether made before or during trial, to exclude 13 anticipated prejudicial evidence before the evidence is actually offered.” Luce v. United 14 States, 469 U.S. 38, 40, n. 2 (1984). The Court’s rulings on the motions in limine will be 15 issued by separate order(s). 16 5. Parties are ordered to admonish witnesses of the Court’s rulings. Failure to comply with a 17 ruling by the Court may result in sanctions, including without limitation the striking of the 18 witness’s entire testimony. 19 6. Witnesses: The parties are limited to calling the witnesses submitted on the list filed for the 20 Pretrial Conference. Upon a showing of good cause, including for rebuttal or impeachment 21 purposes, additional witnesses will only be allowed by Court order. 22 7. By January 15, 2020, the parties shall deliver via email a single joint list of all witnesses, 23 attorneys, and others involved in the trial, in alphabetical order to be shown to prospective 24 jurors during voir dire. The list shall be legible and formatted to fit on one page. 25 8. Exhibits and Exhibit Lists: The parties shall file updated exhibits lists by January 15, 2020. 26 The parties are limited to using the Exhibits submitted on those Exhibit Lists, except that any 27 documents for which Adobe is seeking relief from the special master’s order regarding 1 parties’ exhibit lists.1 By January 15, 2020, the parties must each provide the Court with a 2 flash drive containing all exhibits. 3 No witness may be shown any document or other object until it has been marked for 4 identification using an exhibit number. The parties’ updated Exhibit Lists must identify those 5 for which a stipulation of admissibility exists with an “S” in the appropriate box. Parties are 6 ordered to meet and confer and to stipulate on non-controversial issues of admissibility. 7 Failure to do so will result in the waste of trial time. 8 Dolby’s exhibit list currently contains 1785 entries. Adobe’s exhibit list currently contains 9 1588 entries. Only a fraction of those will ever be admitted. Thus, a full paper set shall not be 10 provided to the Court. Rather, the parties are ordered to provide a set of witness binders to the 11 Court and to each witness, and to provide the Courtroom deputy only with the original set of 12 exhibits being offered. They shall be placed in manila folders, labeled by Exhibit number, to 13 be provided to the jury. 14 The jury may not be shown any exhibits until admitted into evidence or stipulated by the 15 parties as to admissibility without the express permission of the Court. 16 In general, no exhibit shall be admitted at trial unless actually used. Thus, parties are not 17 allowed to argue the relevance of a document not otherwise referenced during trial. 18 The parties shall keep a running Index of all exhibits admitted with short descriptions. The 19 final list shall be provided to the courtroom deputy before closing arguments so that it can 20 accompany the exhibits into the jury room immediately thereafter. 21 The parties shall file a proposed form of order regarding designations, or stipulations if the 22 disputes are resolved, by January 15, 2020. 23 9. Motions to Seal: The pending motions to seal at Docket Numbers 252, 259, 265, 270, 273, 24 276, and 299 concern the licensing amounts at issue, third party licensing agreements, and 25 source code. These motions are therefore granted. 26

27 1 By January 6, 2020, a supplemental list of potential exhibits not currently being litigated 1 Neither party opposes denial of the motions to seal at Docket Numbers 293 and 296, and 2 thus, these motions are denied as moot. 3 For purposes of trial, the Court orders that the parties shall assign a non-numerical terms 4 (e.g., “Rate A” or “the Cloud Letter Rate”) to the critical licensing amounts at issue. Those 5 terms must be used at trial. Jurors and witnesses will have access to a reference document 6 identifying the non-numerical term and corresponding actual amount. By January 15, 2020, 7 the parties shall submit a joint stipulation regarding the non-numerical terms to be used, 8 including the licensing amount. Such stipulation may be filed under seal. 9 10. Equipment: Projectors, screens and similar equipment must be tested in the courtroom prior 10 to the day when it will be used. Arrangements may be made with the Courtroom Deputy, 11 Frances Stone, at (510) 637-3540, as to appropriate time for doing so. The U.S. Marshal 12 requires a court order to allow such equipment into the building. See Civ. L.R. 77-5. Thus, by 13 January 15, 2020, the parties must submit to the Court, by email, a list of equipment which 14 each side intends to bring to trial, as well as a proposed order. 15 11. Parties may use encrypted digital wireless system that includes a receiver and transmitter with 16 XLR connector. 17 12. The parties shall review the Court’s policy regarding the jury’s use of a computer during 18 deliberations at http://cand.uscourts.gov/jurypc. 19 13. Jurors and Peremptory Challenges: The Court will seat a total of nine (9) jurors and no 20 alternates. The Court sets the number of peremptory challenges at four (4). Batson motions 21 must be made in a timely fashion. Argument on the same shall be made outside the presence 22 of the jury panel. 23 14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luce v. United States
469 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Adobe Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolby-laboratories-licensing-corporation-v-adobe-inc-cand-2020.