Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 27, 1991·No. No. 0048220·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL DEFENSE In defense to the plaintiff's common law negligence claim against an owner of property, for a dog bite on such property; the defendant property owner asserts a special defense that defendant: "was neither the owner not (sic) keeper of said dog, and did not harbor, possess or exercise any control over said dog.

The plaintiff has moved to strike such defense.

The lack of any control over the animal as asserted in such defense can constitute a defense to even a common law claim. See Restatement (Second) Torts, Section 514 and Goff v. Timothy, 5 CSCR 245 (March 20, 1990, Berdon, J.).

The Motion to Strike is therefore denied.

HON. ROBERT F. McWEENY Superior Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862 (Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Girasulo v. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc.
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 245 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1937)