Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 27, 1991
DocketNo. 0048220
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862 (Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolbey v. Lausier, No. 0048220 (Sep. 27, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL DEFENSE In defense to the plaintiff's common law negligence claim against an owner of property, for a dog bite on such property; the defendant property owner asserts a special defense that defendant: "was neither the owner not (sic) keeper of said dog, and did not harbor, possess or exercise any control over said dog.

The plaintiff has moved to strike such defense.

The lack of any control over the animal as asserted in such defense can constitute a defense to even a common law claim. See Restatement (Second) Torts, Section 514 and Goff v. Timothy, 5 CSCR 245 (March 20, 1990, Berdon, J.).

The Motion to Strike is therefore denied.

HON. ROBERT F. McWEENY Superior Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Girasulo v. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc.
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 245 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolbey-v-lausier-no-0048220-sep-27-1991-connsuperct-1991.