Home/W.D. New York/DOLBERRY v. Levine

DOLBERRY v. Levine

581 F. Supp. 2d 436, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109560, 2008 WL 4379235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DOLBERRY v. Levine. Read the opinion of the Court — 567 F. Supp. 2d 413 →
District Court, W.D. New York·Decided September 22, 2008·No. 02-CV-6418L·Published

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

By Decision and Order filed July 28, 2008 (Dkt.# 266), this Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. By Notice of Motion filed September 16, 2008 (Dkt.# 269), plaintiff has filed a motion, pro se, to reargue the motion. I treat this as a motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs motion (Dkt.# 269) for reconsideration is in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOLBERRY v. Levine, 581 F. Supp. 2d 436, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109560, 2008 WL 4379235 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).

581 F. Supp. 2d 436 (DOLBERRY v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummings v. Burge
581 F. Supp. 2d 436 (W.D. New York, 2008)