Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dolan v. State

Dolan v. State

780 So. 2d 982, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2001 WL 273846
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-4349
StatusPublished

This text of 780 So. 2d 982 (Dolan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolan v. State, 780 So. 2d 982, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2001 WL 273846 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s postcon-viction motion is hereby affirmed without prejudice to his filing a legally sufficient motion within the time remaining under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Vento v. State, 621 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), where court found 3.850 motion legally insufficient where defendant failed to provide [983]*983sufficient facts supporting his claim of ineffectiveness).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catis v. State
741 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Vento v. State
621 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 So. 2d 982, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 2001 WL 273846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolan-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.