Dolan v. Dolan

259 A.D. 1115, 21 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1940·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, Broome county, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action alleged in the complaint. This cause of action is for a judicial separation. The first cause of action is to set aside a separation agreement. Defendant’s position is that a separation action cannot be maintained while there is a valid separation agreement in existence. There is authority, however, which sanctions the joinder of two such causes of action. (Landes v. Landes, 172 App. Div. 758; Zysman v. Zysman, 140 Misc. 617.) The modern trend of practice favors the joinder of actions wherever possible. The authorities cited by defendant deal with substantive questions and not with an issue of practice. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Poster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dolan v. Dolan, 259 A.D. 1115, 21 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1115 (Dolan v. Dolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Mugnolo v. McGrath
5 A.D.2d 1005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Better v. Butuola
203 Misc. 723 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1952)
de Oteris v. Mario
185 Misc. 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Prosswimmer v. Prosswimmer
182 Misc. 807 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
Dikranian v. Dikranian
263 A.D. 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)