Dolan v. Breslin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dolan v. Breslin

264 A.D. 931, 36 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5408

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 931 (Dolan v. Breslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dolan v. Breslin, 264 A.D. 931, 36 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff setting aside a transfer of real property deeded by plaintiff to defendant upon the ground that there was a failure of consideration. This is an equity action brought by plaintiff-respondent against her son, defendant-appellant, to set aside and cancel of record a deed of property situate in the city of Albany. The court found that defendant-appellant had failed to perform his part of the contract to provide in good faith for plaintiff’s welfare and “ There has, accordingly, been a failure of consideration underlying the transfer which requires that it be set aside.” The decision is amply supported by the evidence and the judgment that the deed be set aside should be affirmed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff setting aside a transfer of real property deeded by plaintiff to defendant upon the ground that there was a failure of consideration. This is an equity action brought by plaintiff-respondent against her son, defendant-appellant, to set aside and cancel of record a deed of property situate in the city of Albany. The court found that defendant-appellant had failed to perform his part of the contract to provide in good faith for plaintiff’s welfare and “ There has, accordingly, been a failure of consideration underlying the transfer which requires that it be set aside.” The decision is amply supported by the evidence and the judgment that the deed be set aside should be affirmed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 931, 36 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolan-v-breslin-nyappdiv-1942.