Dohl v. Clement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dohl v. Clement

107 A. 334, 263 Pa. 581, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 481

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 17, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 99

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 334 (Dohl v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dohl v. Clement, 107 A. 334, 263 Pa. 581, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 481 (Pa. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint of the appellant is of the refusal of the court below to direct a verdict in its favor, and of the subsequent dismissal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. The case as presented by the appellee justified the finding of liability on the part of the defendant, and, as no complaint is made of any ruling on offers of evidence, or of the instructions to the jury, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint of the appellant is of the refusal of the court below to direct a verdict in its favor, and of the subsequent dismissal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. The case as presented by the appellee justified the finding of liability on the part of the defendant, and, as no complaint is made of any ruling on offers of evidence, or of the instructions to the jury, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A. 334, 263 Pa. 581, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dohl-v-clement-pa-1919.