Doherty v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

30 F. App'x 251
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 2002
DocketNo. 01-2005
StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. App'x 251 (Doherty v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doherty v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 30 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Desmond Doherty, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, appeals from the decision and order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his application for suspension of deportation. We have reviewed the record and find the Board correctly determined that Doherty did not meet the continuous presence requirement for suspension of deportation because he failed to accrue seven years of continuous physical presence prior to the initiation of deportation proceedings against him. See Appiah v. U.S. INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 857, 121 S.Ct. 140, 148 L.Ed.2d 92 (2000).

For this reason, we deny Doherty’s petition for review and affirm the decision of the Board. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doherty-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2002.