Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director

762 P.2d 330, 93 Or. App. 352
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 12, 1988·No. CA A40087·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BUTTLER, P. J.

On petitioners’ petition for review of our decision, 92 Or App 22, 758 P2d 865 (1988), we allow reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, and write for the purpose of clarifying the basis for affirming that the Director’s decision establishing the Butter Creek critical ground water area and six subareas. We add only that, whether or not we agree with it, the Director’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. ORS 183.482(8) (c); Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 752 P2d 262 (1988).

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion clarified and adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director, 762 P.2d 330, 93 Or. App. 352 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

762 P.2d 330 (Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director
783 P.2d 519 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)