Doherty v. Oneita Knitting Mill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doherty v. Oneita Knitting Mill

81 N.Y.S. 1124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 81 N.Y.S. 1124 (Doherty v. Oneita Knitting Mill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doherty v. Oneita Knitting Mill, 81 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the plaintiff was to be charged with knowledge of the location and character of defendant’s fan; also, held, that it was contrary to the evidence for the jury to find, as it must have done, that plaintiff did not know that the fan was or might be in motion at the time of the accident, and to find that he was free from contributory negligence in coming in contact with the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the plaintiff was to be charged with knowledge of the location and character of defendant’s fan; also, held, that it was contrary to the evidence for the jury to find, as it must have done, that plaintiff did not know that the fan was or might be in motion at the time of the accident, and to find that he was free from contributory negligence in coming in contact with the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doherty-v-oneita-knitting-mill-nyappdiv-1903.