Doherty v. McWilliams

Third Circuit

Doherty v. McWilliams

63 F. 883, 11 C.C.A. 479, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2451

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 1, 1894

DocketNo. 4

StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. 883 (Doherty v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doherty v. McWilliams, 63 F. 883, 11 C.C.A. 479, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2451 (3d Cir. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

By the assignments of error, it is alleged, in general terms, that the decree of the court below is erroneous. This allegation has not been sustained. No question of law is presented by the record, or is suggested by the argument which has been submitted on behalf of the appellant The district court, upon the conflicting evidence which was before it, reached the conclusion that the libel should be sustained, and our own examination of that evidence satisfies us that this conclusion. is-correct Therefore, the decree is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

By the assignments of error, it is alleged, in general terms, that the decree of the court below is erroneous. This allegation has not been sustained. No question of law is presented by the record, or is suggested by the argument which has been submitted on behalf of the appellant The district court, upon the conflicting evidence which was before it, reached the conclusion that the libel should be sustained, and our own examination of that evidence satisfies us that this conclusion. is-correct Therefore, the decree is affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 F. 883, 11 C.C.A. 479, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doherty-v-mcwilliams-ca3-1894.