Doherty v. Cotter

38 A. 499, 68 N.H. 37
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 38 A. 499 (Doherty v. Cotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doherty v. Cotter, 38 A. 499, 68 N.H. 37 (N.H. 1894).

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The questions arising upon the sale and delivery of the liquors were decided adversely to the defendant in Durkee v. Moses, 67 N. H. 115; and the remaining question, as to the application of the credits on the plaintiffs’ specification, was likewise so decided in Bancroft v. Holton, 59 N. H. 141.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durkee v. Moses
23 A. 793 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1891)
Bancroft v. Holton
59 N.H. 141 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A. 499, 68 N.H. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doherty-v-cotter-nh-1894.