Doh v. Gonzales

193 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2006·No. No. 05-2314·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Kwame Doh, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) order adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying the motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review.

We do not have jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not to sua sponte reopen proceedings. Ali v. Gonzales, 448 F.3d 515, 518 (2d Cir.2006). In addition, we find the immigration judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (2005).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doh v. Gonzales, 193 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2006).

193 F. App'x 245 (Doh v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kap Sun Bukta v. U.S. Attorney General
827 F.3d 1278 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Gor v. Holder
607 F.3d 180 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Zetino v. Holder
Ninth Circuit, 2010
Mosere v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Lydia Mason v. Michael Mukasey
306 F. App'x 897 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Lenis v. U.S. Attorney General
525 F.3d 1291 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Tamenut v. Mukasey
521 F.3d 1000 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Rasi v. Mukasey
256 F. App'x 763 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)