Doggrell v. Board of Assessors of Beekman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doggrell v. Board of Assessors of Beekman

42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 728 (Doggrell v. Board of Assessors of Beekman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doggrell v. Board of Assessors of Beekman, 42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review an assessment of real property, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 11, 1972, which granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that three copies of the petition and notice were not served upon the clerk of the Town of Beekman. Order affirmed, without costs. We are bound to affirm by reason of the determination in Matter of City of New York v. Christensen (30 A D 2d 700, affd. 24 N Y 2d 1002). While we feel that the result here reached is harsh, remedial legislation is the answer. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review an assessment of real property, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 11, 1972, which granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that three copies of the petition and notice were not served upon the clerk of the Town of Beekman. Order affirmed, without costs. We are bound to affirm by reason of the determination in Matter of City of New York v. Christensen (30 A D 2d 700, affd. 24 N Y 2d 1002). While we feel that the result here reached is harsh, remedial legislation is the answer. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doggrell-v-board-of-assessors-of-beekman-nyappdiv-1973.