Doganiero v. Insurance Co. of Ohio

749 N.E.2d 293, 92 Ohio St. 3d 216
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
DocketNo. 01-159
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 749 N.E.2d 293 (Doganiero v. Insurance Co. of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doganiero v. Insurance Co. of Ohio, 749 N.E.2d 293, 92 Ohio St. 3d 216 (Ohio 2001).

Opinions

The question certified for our consideration is “whether R.C. 3937.18[A][2] precludes recovery of underinsured motorist insurance benefits where the insured’s underinsured motorist coverage limits are less than or equal to the tortfeasor’s liability coverage limits but the presence of other claimants prevents the insured from recovering any part of the tortfeasor’s coverage.”

Schulman, Schulman & Meros and Howard A. Schulman, for appellants.

Pursuant to our decisions in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, the certified question is answered in the negative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell and Clark, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doganiero v. Ins. Co. of Ohio
2001 Ohio 177 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
749 N.E.2d 293, 92 Ohio St. 3d 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doganiero-v-insurance-co-of-ohio-ohio-2001.