Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.
122 A.D. 896, 106 N.Y.S. 1122
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1907·Published
Opinion
That part of the order granting a new trial to the defendant railway company is affirmed, with costs to the railway company against the plaintiff to abide the event. The judgment against the defendant Rudolph and that part of the order denying his motion for a new trial are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the defendant Rudolph against the plaintiff to abide the event, upon the authority of Bamberg v. International Railway Co. (121 App. Div. 1; 105 N. Y. Supp. 621). All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co., 122 A.D. 896, 106 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
122 A.D. 896 (Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bamberg v. International Railway Co.
121 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)