Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.
This text of 122 A.D. 896 (Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That part of the order granting a new trial to the defendant railway company is affirmed, with costs to the railway company against the plaintiff to abide the event. The judgment against the defendant Rudolph and that part of the order denying his motion for a new trial are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the defendant Rudolph against the plaintiff to abide the event, upon the authority of Bamberg v. International Railway Co. (121 App. Div. 1; 105 N. Y. Supp. 621). All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D. 896, 106 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/does-v-crosstown-street-railway-co-nyappdiv-1907.