Doerschuck v. Doerschuck

481 So. 2d 1317, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1986·No. No. 85-1668·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition.

LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doerschuck v. Doerschuck, 481 So. 2d 1317, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 330, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 1317 (Doerschuck v. Doerschuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Gallant
211 So. 3d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Comisky v. Rosen Management Service, Inc.
630 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Comisky v. Rosen Management Service
630 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
In re Guardianship of Anderson
568 So. 2d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co.
515 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. USCP CO.
515 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)