Doering v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Doering v. City of Cincinnati

76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 28, 1907

DocketNo. 10619

StatusPublished

This text of 76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636 (Doering v. City of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doering v. City of Cincinnati, 76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636 (Ohio 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

We are all of the opinion that the act whose validity is involved in this case is an exercise of the police power, subject' to all the constitutional limitations which in their nature are applicable to that power. Upon other questions presented we do not find such concurrence of opinion as enables [637]*637us to do more.than announce that the judgment is affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We are all of the opinion that the act whose validity is involved in this case is an exercise of the police power, subject' to all the constitutional limitations which in their nature are applicable to that power. Upon other questions presented we do not find such concurrence of opinion as enables [637]*637us to do more.than announce that the judgment is affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doering-v-city-of-cincinnati-ohio-1907.