Doepfner v. Michaelis

144 F. 1021, 74 C.C.A. 680, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3931
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 1906
DocketNo. 236
StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. 1021 (Doepfner v. Michaelis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doepfner v. Michaelis, 144 F. 1021, 74 C.C.A. 680, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3931 (2d Cir. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, on authority of Brogan v. Hanan (Sup.) 66 N. Y. Supp. 1066, and Trustees v. Foster, 150 N. Y. 354, 50 N. E. 971, 41 L. R. A. 554, 66 Am. St. Rep. 575, cases which are completely In point ,aud in the reasoning of which we fully concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. Foster
50 N.E. 971 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Rosenstein v. . Fox
44 N.E. 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Brogan v. Hanan
55 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. 1021, 74 C.C.A. 680, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doepfner-v-michaelis-ca2-1906.