Home/Ninth Circuit/Doe v. Unocal Corp.

Doe v. Unocal Corp.

395 F.3d 978, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, 2003 WL 359787
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 2003
DocketNos. 00-56603, 00-56628; D.C. Nos. CV-96-06959-RSWL, CV-96-06112-RSWL
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 395 F.3d 978 (Doe v. Unocal Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Unocal Corp., 395 F.3d 978, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, 2003 WL 359787 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 [979]*979it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
373 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Vietnam Ass'n for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co.
373 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Doe v. Liu Qi
349 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (N.D. California, 2004)
Doe v. Rafael Saravia
348 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (E.D. California, 2004)
Falen Gherebi v. George Walker Bush Donald H. Rumsfeld
352 F.3d 1278 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Doe v. Islamic Salvation Front
257 F. Supp. 2d 115 (District of Columbia, 2003)
John Doe I, Individually & as Administrator of the Estate of His Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Jane Doe I, on Behalf of Herself, as Adminstratrix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated John Doe II John Doe III John Doe IV John Doe v. Jane Doe II Jane Doe III John Doe Vi John Doe Vii John Doe Viii John Doe Ix John Doe X John Doe Xi, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated & Louisa Benson on Behalf of Herself & the General Public v. Unocal Corporation, a California Corporation Total S.A., a Foreign Corporation John Imle, an Individual Roger C. Beach, an Individual, John Roe III John Roe Vii John Roe Viii John Roe X v. Unocal Corporation Union Oil Company of California
395 F.3d 978 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 F.3d 978, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, 2003 WL 359787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-unocal-corp-ca9-2003.