Doe v. Unocal Corp.
395 F.3d 978, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, 2003 WL 359787
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2003·No. Nos. 00-56603, 00-56628; D.C. Nos. CV-96-06959-RSWL, CV-96-06112-RSWL·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 [979] it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Unocal Corp., 395 F.3d 978, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, 2003 WL 359787 (9th Cir. 2003).
395 F.3d 978 (Doe v. Unocal Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
373 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Vietnam Ass'n for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co.
373 F. Supp. 2d 7 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Doe v. Liu Qi
349 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (N.D. California, 2004)
Doe v. Rafael Saravia
348 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (E.D. California, 2004)
Falen Gherebi v. George Walker Bush Donald H. Rumsfeld
352 F.3d 1278 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Doe v. Islamic Salvation Front
257 F. Supp. 2d 115 (District of Columbia, 2003)