Doe v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doe v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 372 F.3d 1308
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 5, 2007·No. 2006-5119·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-5119

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

John Doe, pro se.

Gregory T. Jaeger, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Kathryn A. Bleecker, Assistant Director.

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Judge Susan G. Braden NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

__________________________

DECIDED: April 5, 2007 __________________________

Before MAYER, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Doe appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims

denying his claims for relief from a final decision of the United States Air Force to retire

him because of medical disability. Doe v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 165. We affirm on

the basis of the trial court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Doe v. United States (Doe v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 165 (Federal Claims, 2005)