Doe v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2006-5119
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
John Doe, pro se.
Gregory T. Jaeger, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Kathryn A. Bleecker, Assistant Director.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Judge Susan G. Braden NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
__________________________
DECIDED: April 5, 2007 __________________________
Before MAYER, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
John Doe appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims
denying his claims for relief from a final decision of the United States Air Force to retire
him because of medical disability. Doe v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 165. We affirm on
the basis of the trial court’s opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. United States (Doe v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.