Doe v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Doe v. United States

610 F. App'x 291

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2015·No. No. 15-1471·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pylord P. Doe, M.D., appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Doe’s civil action on res judicata grounds and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doe v. United States, No. 8:14-cv-01441-TDC, 2015 WL 1461236 (D.Md. Mar. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [292] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pylord P. Doe, M.D., appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Doe’s civil action on res judicata grounds and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doe v. United States, No. 8:14-cv-01441-TDC, 2015 WL 1461236 (D.Md. Mar. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [292] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Doe v. United States, 610 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

610 F. App'x 291 (Doe v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related