Doe v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel., Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. Div. of Child and Family Servs.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedFebruary 2, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-01929
StatusUnknown

This text of Doe v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel., Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. Div. of Child and Family Servs. (Doe v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel., Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. Div. of Child and Family Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel., Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. Div. of Child and Family Servs., (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 || FELICIA GALATI, ESQ. 5 Nevada Bar No. 007341 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY& STOBERSKI 3 ||9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89129 4 || Phone: 702-384-4012 5 Fax: 702-383-0701 fgalati@ ocgas.com 6 || Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK and 7 || STACEY SILVERSTEIN 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 D.O. JANE DOE, an individual; K.Y. JANE CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01929-APG-MDC DOE, an individual; L.O. JANE DOE, an 13 individual; L.O.J. JOHN DOE, an individual; 5 P.K. JANE DOE, an individual; 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs.

COUNTY OF CLARK, a political (17 subdivision of the State of Nevada; STACEY SILVERSTEIN, an individual,

Defendants. 19 20 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, by and through 22 93 || their respective counsel of record, and subject to the Court’s approval, hereby stipulate and agree 24 ||as follows, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), with respect to the disclosure of Confidential || Information. 26 2. The parties to this action submit this Stipulation and Protective Order (hereinafter 27 “Order”) solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange of documents and information between 28

1 || the parties in this action without involving the Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this ? |! Order nor the production of any information or documents under the terms of this Order nor any proceedings pursuant to this Order shall be deemed to have the effect of an admission or waiver 5 by any party or of altering the confidentiality or non-confidentiality of any such document or 6 ||information or altering any existing obligation of any party or absence thereof. 7 PROCEDURES REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 8 3. The parties define “DFS case records” as all documents, which are in the custody ° of County Defendants, relating to DFS investigation, custody, and placement of Plaintiffs, 10 including, but not limited to, documents relating to all Plaintiffs’ institutional, foster family, and 12 || kin placements; foster family’s licensing files; education, mental health, and health services; and

13 || court proceedings. “DFS case records” shall also include the files and documents of any child

eg a \4 ll who has been or is in DFS custody. The term “document” and “documents” include any written,

printed, typed, recorded, electronic or graphic material of every type and description, and each and every thing from which information can be processed or transcribed, including computer 1g ||teadable storage material. Documents include, but are not limited to, the following: records, 19 ||handwritten notes, reports, agreements, memoranda, email communications, photographs, and 20 || UNITY database entries. 4. The parties acknowledge that DFS case records and the files and documents of any 22 33 child who has been or is in DFS custody contain sensitive information that is generally protected 94 from disclosure pursuant to federal and state law, including without limitation: 25 (a) Information that identifies by name or address, or could reasonably lead to 26 the disclosure of the name or address of any applicant for or recipient of child a welfare, foster care, or adoption assistance services [45 C.F.R. 1355.21]; 28

1 (b) The names and addresses of applicants for and recipients of child welfare, 2 foster care, or adoption assistance services and the amounts of financial assistance ° provided to them [45 C.F.R. 205.50]; 5 (c) Information related to the social and economic conditions or circumstances 6 of particular individual applicants for or recipients of child welfare, foster care, or 7 adoption services [45 C.F.R. 205.50]; 8 (d) Agency evaluations of information about particular individual applicants ° for or recipients of child welfare, foster care, or adoption assistance services [45 10 C.F.R. 205.50]; 12 (e) Medical data concerning particular individual applicants for or recipients of

13 child welfare, foster care, or adoption assistance services [45 C.F.R. 205.50]; and ee iM (f) All records of child abuse reports and all information obtained in investigating reports of child abuse and neglect [45 C.F.R. 1340.14; Nev. Rev. Stat. c 4 Ann. § 432B.280].

1g || The parties also acknowledge that all files or documents of any child who has been or is in DFS = 19 |! custody shall come within the provisions and protections of this Order. 20 5. DFS case records shall be deemed to be Confidential Information pursuant to this Order and defendants shall label them as Confidential upon production. 22 33 6. A party may also label as “Confidential” any discovery that is served or produced 24 ||in this litigation (including subpoenas and deposition testimony), if the marking party believes 25 ||that the information contained in such discovery qualifies for protection under standards 26 developed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) or state or federal law, including the right to privacy. Such information shall be deemed to be Confidential Information pursuant to this Order. 28

1 The fact that a document is stamped “Confidential” by one party shall not be construed as * an admission by any other party that such document is confidential, nor shall it limit or preclude the right of any party to object to the “Confidential” designation and to file any appropriate 5 motion(s) to determine the propriety of such designation. If the producing party inadvertently 6 ||fails to stamp or otherwise appropriately designate or list certain documents, material, or 7 |\information as “Confidential” upon their production or disclosure, such inadvertent failure to 8 designate shall not constitute nor be deemed a waiver of a subsequent claim of protected treatment under this Order. 10 Any party may contest a designation of “Confidential” by serving a written objection (by 12 || letter to the designating Party) to the Confidentiality designation at any time. Upon service of

13 ||/such objection, the Parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the issue informally. If that eg a effort fails, the confidentiality designation shall expire unless, within three weeks of service of

the objection, or such additional time as may be agreed upon the Parties, the Party seeking confidentiality applies to the Court or Magistrate Judge for an order designating the document or 1g ||information confidential. If such an application is made, the document or other information 19 |) marked “Confidential” which is in dispute shall remain “Confidential,” as the case may be, until 20 || the dispute is resolved by and between or among the parties and so confirmed in writing or, if necessary, until order of the Court or any Magistrate Judge. On any such application, the 22 33 proponent of confidentiality shall have the burden of showing, by a preponderance of the 94 ||evidence, good cause for the claimed protection. 25 7. Confidential Information shall only be used for purpose of prosecution, defense, 76 || or settlement of this action, and for no other purpose. 27 28

1 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Doe v. State of Nevada, Ex. Rel., Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. Div. of Child and Family Servs., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-state-of-nevada-ex-rel-dept-of-health-hum-servs-div-of-nvd-2024.