Doe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Doe v. State

638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4151, 1994 WL 162772

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1994

DocketNo. 93-710

StatusPublished

This text of 638 So. 2d 529 (Doe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. State, 638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4151, 1994 WL 162772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, John Doe, appeals a life sentence imposed after the trial court found that he was in substantial non-compliance with his plea agreement. The trial court’s finding of substantial non-compliance with the plea agreement is supported by the record and thus we affirm the sentence. Lopez v. State, 536 So.2d 226 (Fla.1988); Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, John Doe, appeals a life sentence imposed after the trial court found that he was in substantial non-compliance with his plea agreement. The trial court’s finding of substantial non-compliance with the plea agreement is supported by the record and thus we affirm the sentence. Lopez v. State, 536 So.2d 226 (Fla.1988); Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4151, 1994 WL 162772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack