Doe v. State
638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4151, 1994 WL 162772
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 595 So. 2d 212 →
Opinion
Appellant, John Doe, appeals a life sentence imposed after the trial court found that he was in substantial non-compliance with his plea agreement. The trial court’s finding of substantial non-compliance with the plea agreement is supported by the record and thus we affirm the sentence. Lopez v. State, 536 So.2d 226 (Fla.1988); Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. State, 638 So. 2d 529, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4151, 1994 WL 162772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
638 So. 2d 529 (Doe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madrigal v. State
545 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Lopez v. State
536 So. 2d 226 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)