Doe v. Staples Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES ex rei. JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, Relator, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 08-846 (RJL) ) STAPLES, INC. ) ) OFFICEMAX, INC. ) ) TARGET CORP. ) ) INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC. ) ) Defendants. )
b;J ORDER (March 24 2013, Dkts. ##39, 52, 54, 56) - ~ For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this-z:z._, day of
March 2013, it is hereby
ORDERED that OfficeMax, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #39] is
GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Industries for the Blind, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Dkt. #52] is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Target Corp.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #54] is
ORDERED that Staples, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #56] is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
t ~~ RICH~ United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Staples Inc. (Doe v. Staples Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.