Doe v. Staples Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 25, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2008-0846·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES ex rei. JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, Relator, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 08-846 (RJL) ) STAPLES, INC. ) ) OFFICEMAX, INC. ) ) TARGET CORP. ) ) INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC. ) ) Defendants. )

b;J ORDER (March 24 2013, Dkts. ##39, 52, 54, 56) - ~ For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this-z:z._, day of

March 2013, it is hereby

ORDERED that OfficeMax, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #39] is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Industries for the Blind, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment

[Dkt. #52] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Target Corp.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #54] is

ORDERED that Staples, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #56] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

t ~~ RICH~ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Staples Inc., (D.D.C. 2013).

Doe v. Staples Inc. (Doe v. Staples Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.