Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 23, 2024·No. 13-0471V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-471V Filed: November 7, 2024 Reissued for Public Availability: December 23, 2024

* * * * * * * * * * * * * JANE DOE, * * Petitioner, * * * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Jane Doe, Pro Se. Benjamin P. Warder, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON DAMAGES 1

Roth, Special Master:

On July 12, 2013, Jane Doe (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner alleges that she developed multiple sclerosis (“MS”) after receiving a Twinrix (hepatitis A/B) vaccine on February 16, 2011. Petition, ECF No. 1; Amended Petition, ECF No. 159. A Ruling on Entitlement issued on June 30, 2023, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for her injuries. ECF No. 198.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. This Decision originally issued on November 7, 2024 and the parties were afforded fourteen days to propose redactions in accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b). Petitioner moved for redactions, and her motion was granted. Accordingly, this Decision is reissued with redactions for posting on the Court’s website. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

1 On August 14, 2024, a Ruling on Damages issued, and respondent was ordered to file a finalized Life Care Plan and lost income computation consistent with the Ruling on Damages. ECF No. 226.

On November 7, 2024, respondent filed a status report, the final Life Care Plan, and a funding chart. ECF Nos. 246, 252. Respondent’s submission provides for the following in keeping with the Ruling on Damages:

A. A lump sum payment of $1,574,676.59, representing compensation for life care expenses (including life care items awarded by the Special Master) expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($57,656.32), lost earnings ($1,267,020.27), and pain and suffering ($250,000.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in section II. B. of respondent’s status report.

I adopt respondent’s damages calculations attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. 3 The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Because petitioner moved for redactions after respondent filed his status report with the calculations of damages and because petitioner’s motion to redact was granted, respondent refiled his status report with redactions as attached hereto. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JANE DOE,

Petitioner, No. 13-471V Special Master Roth v. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S AMENDED STATUS REPORT REGARDING COMPENSATION TO BE AWARDED AND FORM OF AWARD1

On September 18, 2024, pursuant to the Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Redaction (ECF

No. 237 at 1-7), the Special Master issued a partially redacted Ruling on Damages (ECF No. 237 at

8-29), in which she directed respondent to “file a status report which includes (l) a complete and

final Life Care Plan which reflects the above findings and (2) the lost income computation based

on the above findings.” ECF No. 237 at 28.

Respondent submits this amended status report providing the Special Master with a

statement of all damages, including those that the parties have agreed upon as well as those decided

by the Special Master, in the manner that contains the information needed for the Special Master’s

Damages Order.2

While preserving his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the

1 Respondent files this amended status report pursuant to the Court’s December 12, 2024 Order, which granted petitioner’s second motion to redact, and in which the Court directed that in the Decision Awarding Damages “and going forward,” petitioner would be referred to as “Jane Doe,” and the case caption would reflect “Jane Doe” as the petitioner in this case. ECF No. 251 at 1. 2 Respondent submits this status report on behalf of respondent only. 1 Special Master’s September 18, 2024 Ruling on Damages, respondent submits the following

status report regarding damages.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, and CLCP, to

provide an estimation of petitioner’s future vaccine-injury-related needs. On April 22, 2024,

respondent filed the most recent life care plan prepared by petitioner’s former life care planner,

which was dated December 15, 2020. Exhibit (“Ex.”) RR. Agreed-upon life care items, as

well as life care items awarded by the Special Master, are illustrated by the chart entitled

“Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Jane Doe,” attached to this status report as Tab A.3

B. Lost Earnings

Based upon the evidence of record, petitioner is entitled to an award for lost earnings

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Doe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a