Doe v. Schuylkill County Courthouse

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania·Decided November 1, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-00477·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JANE DOE, et al., : Civil No. 3:21-CV-477 : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : SCHUYLKILL COUNTY : COURTHOUSE, et al., : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) : Defendants. :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The background of this order is as follows: The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this case, and on October 29, 2021we held a case management conference to address the state of the pleadings and various pending motions. Accordingly, as discussed at this conference, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The plaintiffs will file a comprehensive amended complaint on or before November 1, 2021. 2. We believe that this development has substantive significance for the parties with respect to the prior pending motions to amend or to dismiss (Docs. 24, 29, 37, 40, and 53) since, as a matter of law, an amended complaint takes the place of any prior complaint, effectively invalidating the prior complaint. Crysen/Montenay 1 Energy Co. v. Shell Oil Co. (In re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.), 226 F.3d 160, 162 (2d Cir. 2000) ("[A]n amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders

it of no legal effect"); see 6 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure ' 1476 (2d ed. 1990) ("A pleading that has been amended Y supersedes the pleading it modifiesY. Once an amended pleading is

interposed, the original pleading no longer performs any function in the caseY."). Therefore, these prior pending motions (Docs. 24, 29, 37, 40, and 53) are DISMISSED as moot. 3. However, this leave to file an amended complaint is granted without

prejudice to the assertion of any defenses or dispositive motions that the defendants may believe are appropriate with respect to the second amended complaint. 4. On or before November 5, 2021, the parties shall file a proposed

stipulated confidentiality order or submit letter briefs and their competing drafts of proposed confidentiality orders governing discovery so the court may fashion a confidentiality order in this case. 5. On or before November 12, 2021, the parties will file a joint status report

advising the court regarding whether any action is required with respect to the pending motion for preliminary injunction filed in this case. (Doc. 3).

2 SO ORDERED, this 1st day of November 2021.

/s/ Martin C. Carlson Martin C. Carlson United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Schuylkill County Courthouse, (M.D. Pa. 2021).

Doe v. Schuylkill County Courthouse (Doe v. Schuylkill County Courthouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related