Doe v. Ronan

920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2010
Docket2009-2104
StatusPublished

This text of 920 N.E.2d 371 (Doe v. Ronan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Ronan, 920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, No. 1:09CV243. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 18.6. The court will answer the following questions:

“1. [Do] R.C. 3319.391 and Ohio Adm.Code 3301-20-01 violate the Retroactivity Clause of Article II, Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution?”

“2. [Do] R.C. 3319.391 and Ohio Adm.Code 3301-20-01 violate the Contract Clause of Article II, Section 28 of the Ohio Constitution?”

Moyer, C.J., and Cupp, J., would answer the first question only. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of David M. Lieberman by Benjamin C. Mizer granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 N.E.2d 371, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-ronan-ohio-2010.