Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese

245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 651

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 118 (Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese, 245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered October 9, 1996, which granted movant John Cardinal O’Connor’s motions for protective orders and to quash nonparty subpoenas, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The nonparty subpoenas issued pursuant to CPLR 3102 (e) and served on John Cardinal O’Connor relate to two consolidated actions brought in Texas against the Roman Catholic Church and various other individuals and organizations in its hierarchy, arising out of allegations of sexual abuse committed by a priest serving as a military chaplain.

The court (170 Misc 2d 43 ) properly exercised its discretion in granting Cardinal O’Connor’s motions where he submitted sworn evidence that although at the relevant times he had been an official of the Military Vicariate, he did not know the priest in question and lacked the type of information sought by plaintiffs, and that the examination sought was improper and constituted harassment (see, Matter of Ayliffe & Cos., 166 AD2d 223, 224). Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the court correctly applied the Ayliffe test and found that plaintiffs actually sought the Cardinal’s testimony because he had been an official with the Military Vicariate. Since the Military Vicariate already provided representatives who possessed adequate information, the court properly found that the issuance of protective orders was justified in order to prevent unnecessary harassment. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ. [See, 170 Misc 2d 43.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered October 9, 1996, which granted movant John Cardinal O’Connor’s motions for protective orders and to quash nonparty subpoenas, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The nonparty subpoenas issued pursuant to CPLR 3102 (e) and served on John Cardinal O’Connor relate to two consolidated actions brought in Texas against the Roman Catholic Church and various other individuals and organizations in its hierarchy, arising out of allegations of sexual abuse committed by a priest serving as a military chaplain.

The court (170 Misc 2d 43 ) properly exercised its discretion in granting Cardinal O’Connor’s motions where he submitted sworn evidence that although at the relevant times he had been an official of the Military Vicariate, he did not know the priest in question and lacked the type of information sought by plaintiffs, and that the examination sought was improper and constituted harassment (see, Matter of Ayliffe & Cos., 166 AD2d 223, 224). Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the court correctly applied the Ayliffe test and found that plaintiffs actually sought the Cardinal’s testimony because he had been an official with the Military Vicariate. Since the Military Vicariate already provided representatives who possessed adequate information, the court properly found that the issuance of protective orders was justified in order to prevent unnecessary harassment. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ. [See, 170 Misc 2d 43.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 118, 665 N.Y.S.2d 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-roman-catholic-diocese-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack