Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis

275 S.W.3d 323, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604, 2008 WL 5456225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 230
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. ED 90858·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Matt Doe, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the defendant, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis. 1 The trial court dismissed without prejudice counts one through seven of the plaintiffs petition and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant Archdiocese on the eighth count. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

1

. The archbishop was named a defendant solely in his representative capacity as head of the Archdiocese, a non-profit unincorporated association at the time of suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis, 275 S.W.3d 323, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1604, 2008 WL 5456225 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

275 S.W.3d 323 (Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.