Doe v. Roe

86 A. 517, 25 Del. 414, 2 Boyce 414, 1907 Del. LEXIS 59
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedApril 17, 1907
DocketNo. 24
StatusPublished

This text of 86 A. 517 (Doe v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Roe, 86 A. 517, 25 Del. 414, 2 Boyce 414, 1907 Del. LEXIS 59 (Del. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The concluding paragraph of the case stated is: — “If the Court shall be of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the premises in question, mentioned in the demise laid in her declaration, then judgment shall be entered for her, but if not, judgment shall be entered for the defendant.”

The court is clearly of the opinion that, under the facts and questions of law presented, judgment should be entered for the defendant, which is accordingly done.

And now, to wit, this seventeenth day of April, A. D. 1907, this cause having been heard, and the court being of the opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover the premises in question, mentioned in the demise laid in her declaration, judgment is hereby entered for the defendant.

(Signed by the court.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A. 517, 25 Del. 414, 2 Boyce 414, 1907 Del. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-roe-delsuperct-1907.