Doe v. PRESENTMENT OF GRAND JURY SPRING TERM 2007
This text of 997 So. 2d 1250 (Doe v. PRESENTMENT OF GRAND JURY SPRING TERM 2007) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John DOE, Appellant,
v.
PRESENTMENT OF GRAND JURY SPRING TERM 2007, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*1251 Robert A. Leventhal, of Leventhal & Slaughter, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
Lawson Lamar, State Attorney, and Steven K. Foster, Assistant State Attorney, Orlando, for Appellee.
PLEUS, J.
John Doe appeals the trial court's order refusing to expunge certain portions of a grand jury presentment. We affirm the trial court's order and refusal to expunge the statements. However, given the State's acquiescence in oral argument, we remand to the trial court for removal of the quotation marks around the phrases to which Doe objects in his appellate brief.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR REDACTION OF QUOTATION MARKS.
GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
997 So. 2d 1250, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2009 WL 7679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-presentment-of-grand-jury-spring-term-2007-fladistctapp-2009.