Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health

166 A.D.2d 397, 573 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 A.D.2d 397 (Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health, 166 A.D.2d 397, 573 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied wherein it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from this court’s order (161 AD2d 123) entered on May 1, 1990; wherein reargument is sought, the motion is granted solely to the extent of further modifying the aforesaid order so as to limit items 5 and 6 of the subpoena to the applicable period from January 1, 1984 to December 2, 1987, and by adding the following sentence at the end of the memorandum decision (supra, at 125) accompanying said order: "In addition, to the extent that items 5 and 6 set no time period for the records demanded, they are overbroad and should be limited to the applicable period after January 1, 1984.” Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied wherein it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from this court’s order (161 AD2d 123) entered on May 1, 1990; wherein reargument is sought, the motion is granted solely to the extent of further modifying the aforesaid order so as to limit items 5 and 6 of the subpoena to the applicable period from January 1, 1984 to December 2, 1987, and by adding the following sentence at the end of the memorandum decision (supra, at 125) accompanying said order: "In addition, to the extent that items 5 and 6 set no time period for the records demanded, they are overbroad and should be limited to the applicable period after January 1, 1984.” Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 397, 573 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-office-of-professional-medical-conduct-of-new-york-state-department-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack