Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health

166 A.D.2d 397, 573 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion denied wherein it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from this court’s order (161 AD2d 123) entered on May 1, 1990; wherein reargument is sought, the motion is granted solely to the extent of further modifying the aforesaid order so as to limit items 5 and 6 of the subpoena to the applicable period from January 1, 1984 to December 2, 1987, and by adding the following sentence at the end of the memorandum decision (supra, at 125) accompanying said order: "In addition, to the extent that items 5 and 6 set no time period for the records demanded, they are overbroad and should be limited to the applicable period after January 1, 1984.” Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health, 166 A.D.2d 397, 573 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 397 (Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of New York State Department of Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York City Commission on Human Rights v. Cush
180 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)