Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided February 7, 2020·No. 0:18-cv-03152·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

John-Henry Doe, Case No. 18-cv-3152 (WMW/ECW)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION

Mower County Sheriff’s Office and Jason Bresser,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the December 20, 2019 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Dkt. 36.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The December 20, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 36), is ADOPTED. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 20), is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff John-Henry Doe’s claims against Defendant Mower County Sheriff’s Office are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Doe’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. Plaintiff John-Henry Doe’s Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym, (Dkt. 17), is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: February 7, 2020 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office, (mnd 2020).

Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office (Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related