Doe v. Massillon City School District

887 N.E.2d 351, 118 Ohio St. 3d 1210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 2008·No. No. 2007-1311·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in his concurrence in Garrett v. Sandusky (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 139, 624 N.E.2d 704.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Massillon City School District, 887 N.E.2d 351, 118 Ohio St. 3d 1210 (Ohio 2008).

887 N.E.2d 351 (Doe v. Massillon City School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garrett v. City of Sandusky
624 N.E.2d 704 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)