Doe v. Massillon City School District

887 N.E.2d 351, 118 Ohio St. 3d 1210
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-1311
StatusPublished

This text of 887 N.E.2d 351 (Doe v. Massillon City School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Massillon City School District, 887 N.E.2d 351, 118 Ohio St. 3d 1210 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in his concurrence in Garrett v. Sandusky (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 139, 624 N.E.2d 704.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrett v. City of Sandusky
624 N.E.2d 704 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
887 N.E.2d 351, 118 Ohio St. 3d 1210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-massillon-city-school-district-ohio-2008.