Doe v. Marselle

665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 372
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 28, 1995·No. SC 15312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 360 (AC 13338), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the second amended complaint did not allege a willful violation of General Statutes § 19a-583 (a)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counts had been properly stricken?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Marselle, 665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 372 (Colo. 1995).

665 A.2d 606 (Doe v. Marselle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Marselle
675 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)