Doe v. Marselle
665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 372
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 28, 1995
DocketSC 15312
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 665 A.2d 606 (Doe v. Marselle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doe v. Marselle, 665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 372 (Colo. 1995).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 360 (AC 13338), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the second amended complaint did not allege a willful violation of General Statutes § 19a-583 (a)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counts had been properly stricken?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doe v. Marselle
675 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
665 A.2d 606, 235 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-marselle-conn-1995.