Doe v. Karpf
This text of 36 A.D.3d 652 (Doe v. Karpf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), entered January 19, 2006, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to quash two subpoenas served upon nonparty treating physicians.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant failed to demonstrate special circumstances warranting the discovery sought from the nonparty treating physicians (see Tannenbaum v Tenenbaum, 8 AD3d 360 [2004]; Lanzello v Lakritz, 287 AD2d 601 [2001]; Murphy v Macarthur Holding B., 269 AD2d 507 [2000]; Bunkley v Penske Truck Leasing Corp., 237 AD2d 399, 400 [1997]). Crane, J.P., Mastro, Santucci and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.3d 652, 826 N.Y.S.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-karpf-nyappdiv-2007.